x

Type in what your trying to find.

Snippets

UK universities’ last taxonomic botanist

GardenDrum

GardenDrum

June 13, 2013

Herbarium_-_piles Photo Ludovic Péron

Robert Scotland at Oxford is the last taxonomic botanist to be found in any UK university. Despite the world’s rapid loss of huge numbers of plant species, taxonomic botany gets so little funding that 70,000 plants remain undescribed and there’s an average of 35 years between discovery and proper classification. The plants have often been collected but are sitting in various herbaria around the world, waiting for a taxonomic botanist to get the time and the funding to describe them, and then compare them to already described species.

Photo Earth100

Sweet potato Photo Earth100

And it’s not just rare or ornamental plants that need systematic work done on them; an important commercial crop like sweet potato – genus Ipomoea – is yet to get a modern revision of its 3000 names and 800 species.

As there is no central catalogue of already described plants, and with insufficient resources going into systematic botany, it’s very difficult to make an accurate species description and then check through all the descriptions and names that might have been given to the same plant in different countries to then determine one single internationally agreed name. And that checking is also required to know whether a new plant is indeed a newly discovered species or something that’s already been described……..somewhere……

Source: Robyn Williams interviews Robert Scotland, Reader of botanical systematics at Oxford University, on ABC Radio’s The Science Show.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris
Chris
7 years ago

70,000 species undescribed ? Doubt that very much – Botanists always exagerate the number of plant species , it’s their bread and butter after all.

Peter
Peter
6 years ago

Chris – are you seriously suggesting that botanists are lying in order to drum up business? What evidence do you have to support this slur?